Wildlife Photography at Spurn

I will be having a stand at this years Migfest at Spurn to showcase wildlife photography at Spurn. Why not pop in at Westmere farm on Saturday or Sunday to talk about the brilliant opportunities for wildlife photography at Spurn?

The following notes should hopefully give you some useful tips on Bird Photography at Spurn.

The first thing to emphasise are a couple of golden rules.

The first one (I'm sure you'll be familiar with) is that the birds welfare must always come first before your need to get a good photograph. Please don't harass the bird with constant flushing by trying to get an extra few yards closer.

Please don't use tapes or lures to entice the bird out of cover-this is especially important during the breeding season. Usually, with patience the birds will come out and show well.

Another thing to consider is the fact that a lot of people travel a long way to see the birds at Spurn. It us not really fair to flush or frighten birds away in pursuit of a photograph, please be considerate to other birders.

Finally, most of the area around Spurn is accessible but there are areas of private land. Please respect local residents, their privacy and private land. We are fortunate enough to have a good relationship with most landowners and residents and it is important that this relationship is preserved.

The next thing to bear in mind is that photographing birds at Spurn is not easy and whilst the log on the sightings page may look impressive the photographic opportunities rarely get anywhere near that. Its all about narrowing your options to give yourself the best chance of success taking into account time of year, species, weather conditions, location (and when waders are the quarry-high tide times)

The best thing to do is plan your visit- starting with the time of year in order of priority the best time is Autumn. Common, scarce and rare migrants can be plentiful in the right conditions. Rain with an easterly or north-easterly wind are almost ideal. Autumn migration at Spurn can start as early as mid August with common migrants such as flycatchers, whinchats and redstarts with the odd wood warbler and Iicterine warbler in favourable conditions. As we move into September wrynecks, shrikes, red-breasted flycatchers and the first yellow browed warblers begin to show. it when we get to October that the really impressive falls can happen huge numbers of thrushes, bramblings and gold crests often occur in the right conditions. These are sometimes accompanied by scarce and rare warblers, wheatears chats and robins in fact almost anything can turn up.

untitled (1 of 1)-241.jpg
untitled (1 of 1)-235.jpg

The next best time of year is Spring again in favourable conditions it can be quite spectacular. Spring usually starts late at Spurn with very little happening in March, there may be the odd black redstart and the first wheatears and chiff-chaffs start to appear. April sees the first wagtails, warblers start to arrive and towards the end of the month the first of the scarce and rare birds start to appear. May is by far the best month in Spring and towards the end of the month again in the right conditions it can be brilliant with the chance of golden oriole, bee eater blue throat or even something rarer like a rock thrush.

untitled (1 of 1)-81.jpg

Winter can be good but options are reduced. Here the focus is more on wildfowl and waders. there is much less chance of a rarity in winter (but still an outside chance) but here the focus is more on the spectacular numbers of waders at high tide combined with spectacular sunrises and sunsets and the opportunity for something more creative. There is also wildfowl and the focus is on geese, ducks, swans and the odd scarce grebe primarily around Kilnsea wetlands, the Humber and the coast.

untitled (1 of 1)-18.jpg
untitled (1 of 1)-51.jpg

Summertime is probably the least productive time at Spurn especially between mid June and mid July. However there are still some opportunities, again usually around Kilnsea Wetlands and Beacon ponds but nowhere near as diverse as peak Autumn. Also the light is particularly harsh in mid summer so it is best to stick to early morning or late evening for the best results.

untitled (1 of 1)-377.jpg

Once you have worked out when you are coming then it's time to plan what you want to see. The sightings page on the Spurn Bird Obs is a good place to start this is usually updated daily at peak migration time. Then there's the information services on the net-Birdguides, Rare Bird Alert and Rare Bird Network are just a few then there's social media Facebook and Twitter are great places to get a handle on what's happening. This information can be crucial to planning your visit so you get the most out of your day.

The site is also covered by a radio network and the licence is obtained when you join friends of spurn you will also have to purchase your radio but this is the best way to keep abreast of what is being found on the day.

 

The next important thing is deciding where to go when you arrive-some of the best areas for bird photography include Sammys Point, Beacon Ponds, The Crown and Anchor Car Park,Canal Scrape and bushes,  the Triangle, The Warren and anywhere down the peninsula (now involves a long walk!).However great birds can turn up anywhere at Spurn.

 

The weather also plays an important part ideally any wind from an easterly direction with rain will bring in the birds at the right time of year-if this is followed up with a bright spell immediately after, this can be perfect conditions. prolonged westerly or south westerly winds are probably the worst and they reduce your chances somewhat-in fact any really strong winds reduce your chances (apart from creative shots over the sea) quite dramatically.

 

Finally the last thing to think about is the time of day- mornings are usually the best and the earlier you arrive the better. Sunrises over the sea can be spectacular providing great creative opportunities also the low light of early morning brings out colour and detail, also the low light towards evening has the same effect (although birds can be less active) with the harsh light of mid-day being the less best for photography (go for a pint and lunch in the Crown & Anchor.

 

 

As with everything there are always exceptions to the rule- expect the unexpected at Spurn!

 

Some other points for consideration;

Light- simple rule the sun behind you gives detail, the sun in front of you gives drama! For good bird photography that brings out colour it is always preferable to have the sun behind you. Where the opportunity exists have that awareness a put yourself in the best position to capture the detail.

The sun in front of you will reduce dramatically the chance of getting detail but this is when creativity and drama comes in to play. Ideally first thing in the morning (shooting over the sea) or last thing in the evening (over the Humber) are the optimum times. Seabirds and waders being the main quarry. This is often a good strategy when there is little else about.

It makes a nice photo if you can isolate the bird from the distraction of leaves, twigs and anything else that takes your eye away from the subject ( not always easy when all they want to do is feed and carry on either their journey!) but it pays to observe behaviour, sometimes they have a favoured perch they return to.

Also the background can be equally important, the soft tones of brown and green can be far more pleasing on the eye than a harsh blue or white background when photographing against the sky, again positioning yourself with this in mind is all important.

Get down to eye level-being at eye lever with the bird creates a more intimate image. This may involve getting prone on the floor especially when photographing wagtails and wheatears in the grass-in fact any bird on the floor get down and dirty!

Spurn is not just great for bird photography –the insects and mammals aren’t bad either!

What to do with your photos when you get home.

I usually store and edit them in Adobe Lightroom (there's another whole series there!) then I post them on my blog with a write up of the days events.i also post them on twitter and Facebook and usually copy in Spurn Bird Observatory.

Ultimately it's nice if you can get your photos in print Spurn Wildlife is the annual report produced by Spurn Bird Observatory and it's always nice to get a few photos in there.

I hope these notes are useful for your visit.Spurn is a brilliant place for wildlife photography and great photographs can be taken all year long planing it gives you an even better chance -get out there and enjoy it!

Spurn Liaison group-Update

Some more news on the Spurn Liaison group.

I received a response from the CEO of East Riding of Yorkshire Council following her meeting with the Yorkshire Wildlife Trust to discuss the Spurn Liaison group.My response is below.

I received a standard response from the National Lottery regarding some queries on Coastal Communities money and I have gone back to them for some more in-depth information.

I still have not received a response from the Chair of the Spurn Liaison group asking him to confirm his position. This is disappointing as I believe weak leadership is one of the primary causes of the failure of the Spurn Liaison group.

Dear ********

 

Thank you for your response to my email regarding the Spurn Liaison Group (SLG).

Unfortunately I cannot agree with some of your comments for the following reasons.

Firstly I do not represent an organisation. I am on the SLG to represent an 'interest group' (as mentioned within the protocols document submitted by Yorkshire Wildlife Trust [YWT] relating to Planning Condition 21).

My interest group is wildlife photography and as such views are my own and are essentially focussed ( but not limited to) opportunities at Spurn for wildlife photography and how the visitor experience will be enhanced as a result of the wider development at Spurn.

Whist you do not go into detail about the 'fundamental issues between organisations represented on the group', I can only presume that you are referring to the frustrations arising from numerous members of the group because of the apparent lack of commitment and willingness from YWT to divulge basic information relating to the development of the visitor centre when it has been reasonably requested.

Some information that is still outstanding includes;

A representative from ERYC Highways department has not attended an SLG meeting to explain the detail around traffic management and the potential introduction of double yellow lines along Spurn Road, despite being reasonably requested at SLG meetings.

There are no definitive answers on access to Spurn, specifically opening times, extent of gates,disabled access and access to the public footpath, despite being reasonably requested at SLG meetings.

There has been no sharing of the Spurn masterplan and potential introduction of ideas and suggestions for visitor experience enhancements by members of the SLG despite discussions at SLG meetings.

Also YWT did not write a letter to local residents at the start of the project informing local residents of basic information such as start dates, contact information and information on vehicle movements despite being reasonably requested at SLG meetings.

These are facts that cannot be disputed and it would not be unreasonable to suggest that YWT have been selective in the information they have released to the SLG.

 

The protocol set up for the running of the SLG meetings had to be submitted to the East Riding of Yorkshire Council (ERYC) for approval. That would suggest that the content had to be meaning and relevant to the ERYC for it to be approved.

 

In my view therefore there are 2 main purposes of the SLG.

The first is to keep members and the wider community informed. for reasons stated above (and others that can be produced on request), it is abundantly clear that the SLG has not been kept adequately informed. This assumption is based on fact.

 

The second important purpose of the SLG is to build and maintain relations. This is more subjective and it is on this point I agree with you. Whilst not going into detail, you have clearly recognised 'fundamental issues between organisations represented on the group'. The likelihood for disagreement is also recognised within the protocols document. Whilst it would be difficult to measure at this stage, I would be interested in understanding how you can conclude that the objective of building and maintaining relations has been achieved? I am firmly of the opinion that relations with YWT and the local community have not improved as a result of the introduction of planning condition 21.

I am also of the opinion that the SLG lacked strong leadership and this has been fundamental as to why the group has not fulfilled its objectives.

For all of the reasons stated above I cannot agree with your statement that ' The liaison group is essentially a means to communicate to the wider community issues relating to the development of the visitor centre and as such will have served its purpose when the visitor centre opens'.

The SLG has not fulfilled its purpose.

 

In my view YWT have not communicated properly ( more a show of reluctance and obstinacy) and there is no demonstrable evidence to suggest relations have been repaired or maintained and as such ERYC should not have discharged Planning Condition 21.

 

It is disappointing to note your comment ' I agreed with YWT that he next meeting should be when the building opens and this will be the last meeting as the group has fulfilled its purpose'. It is disappointing to think that you didn't want to discuss this matter with the SLG face to face before coming to this conclusion. You could have and you should have.

There are a lot of people on the SLG that care passionately about Spurn. The SLG offered some hope that everybody could work together for the greater good of Spurn and this opportunity has now been taken away.

 

YWT have recently been granted £1.1 million of Coastal Communities money. It is disappointing that ERYC are content to allow an organisation ( in this case YWT) to spend a substantial amount of money in the local community which is designed to promote growth and create jobs, without any mechanism of communicating to they very community the money is intended to help. This cannot be right.

 

Finally I have written to ****** **** under separate cover voicing the same concerns as stated above.

I am awaiting his response that will determine my next course of action.

 

Best Regards Martin

Spurn Liaison Group Update

I thought I would provide an update on the Spurn Liaison Group (SLG) as there has been some news this week.

Firstly though, the things that haven't happened. I wrote to the CEO of East Riding Of Yorkshire Council (ERYC) asking for a summary of her discussions with Yorkshire Wildlife Trust (YWT) regarding the SLG. I am awaiting her response.

I wrote to the Chair of the SLG advising of my concerns over the leadership and lack of impetus from ERYC and lack of action from YWT and re emphasised my concerns highlighted in my previous blog post.I am awaiting his response.

I wrote to the National Lottery asking for an explanation on how coastal communities money works and if they would share the details of the £1.1 million reportedly allocated to YWT for spending at Spurn. I am awaiting their response.

I was also in email dialogue with the Planning Officer who manages the Visitor Centre planning conditions.

She advised me that Planning Condition 21 has been discharged.I wrote back expressing my disappointment at this news. That planning condition was set up specifically to keep the local community informed of matters relating to the construction of the VC and had the wider objective of repairing and maintaining relations with the local community.

HOW CAN THAT CONDITION POSSIBLY BE DISCHARGED?

ERYC have now conceded their position of power and can no longer use the planning process to hold YWT to account.If I was running the process I would have made it absolutely clear that all reasonable questions had to be answered in full and there was a demonstrable improvement in relations with the local community.Only then could the condition have been discharged. It appears to me that constantly ignoring requests for information , kicking matters down the football pitch in the hope they go away and no evidence of an improvement in relations, constitutes compliance.

 

I was also informed in writing from the Planning Officer that ERYC and YWT have decided that the next SLG meeting will be the last.That decision has been made with no consultation with the SLG! -sorry people, despite the fact that you may want this group to continue, despite the fact that you care passionately about Spurn, despite the fact that we promised to make things better when we gave planning permission for the VC, it's just got a little bit too hard and we , not you have decided that we are calling it a day. You can draw your own conclusions on that one.

This for me has highlighted beyond doubt how hollow and quite frankly worthless Planning Condition 21 actually is and seriously questions my faith in the whole planning process. Despite what was written in the protocols document YWT and ERYC have clearly not fulfilled what they promised, even though they must have known it would be a sensitive process ( that itself is acknowledged in the protocols document).the minute it has got a little bit tricky (which it was bound to do)they have binned it off.

The minutes of the previous meeting have now been issued precisely 4 weeks after the meeting was held.

On the subject of minutes, I have checked the last set of minutes from the May meeting against those posted on the YWT website.As of today 19th August those posted on YWT website are not the same set issued to the SLG.  I have written to ERYC voicing my concern.

The minutes go into detail regarding the introduction of the local community police officer to the group. This was not an item on the agenda and took me somewhat by surprise. Apparently there had been some minor incident of trespass ( what building site nowadays doesn't have issues of this to deal with?) some damage to a notice board and a suggestion of intimidation to the contractors. It made me feel uncomfortable and there was almost a suggestion that the members of the SLG might be implicated. so much so that 2 of the members met with the officer separately to voice their concerns. Personally I thought it was quite a cynical move by YWT. Read the minutes for yourself.

It was minuted after discussion that 'YWT is keen to work with a wide group of people to deliver an inclusive vision for Spurn' - these are just hollow, meaningless words-you have already informed us that the next SLG meeting will be the last? Don't forget the minutes will be posted on the YWT website and they create an illusion of sincerity and paint a completely different picture to reality to anyone reading the minutes who wasn't actually there.

 

An actions tracker was sent out with the last minutes. This is a document that has never been issued before (maybe it would have been a good communication tool to issue after each meeting?)

Having read it in detail it is nothing more than a flimsy collection of points raised, actions arising and a note stating whether it has been closed or not. This document has no doubt been put together by YWT and submitted as evidence to close out planning condition 21. Some extracts are below.

'XX advised that YWT would look at the suggestions regarding opening hours of the car park. Habitat Regulations Assessment highlighted that the use of car parks could introduce disturbance to bats and SPA bird species. In addition potential disturbance to residents to lights and from overnight parking.HRA states that the car park will be open from after dawn until dusk. Opening other times only for occasional special events and visitors carefully supervised. We therefore plan to close the car park during the night'. 

After dawn until dusk? Is someone trying to wind me up? No mention of access on to Spurn, will it be gated? No specific time after dawn. How about access to the public footpath? Tells us absolutely nothing.Access has been a major discussion point since February and it has taken since then for this response.Pathetic.

 

'XX advised that would endeavour to send out minutes earlier.Done. Complete'....meaningless words.

2 notice boards and update in village hall.Done. Complete,.....not done, meaningless words.

(June) Spurn masterplan meeting to be arranged next meeting.' ....not done, meaningless words.

 

Crucially there was no mention of the proposed visit by the highways officer to advise on detail of traffic management and double yellow lines.

No clarification of disabled access despite being asked for in March.

No mention of the request for an archaeology report that gave the green light for building works to start despite concerns at the start.

No mention of the request for a letter to be sent out to residents advising that the works were due to start.

No mention of aspiration for gold award for Considerate Constructors.

No mention of the considerate constructors report to be issued to the SLG.

All reasonable requests in the name of keeping people informed all conveniently overlooked.

There was a note in the minutes regarding the cost of the visitor centre I quote; ' XX advised that there will be a financial/budgetary review and will be reported back at the next meeting but the initial budget is 1.3 million and that is approximately £400,000 over budget'

An extract from the Coastal Communities Fund website is here the Coastal Communities Fund is designed to support the economic development of coastal communities by promoting sustainable economic growth and jobs

The breakdown of the coastal communities money has been released, please see below.

Spurn

Contribution to Spurn discovery centre £383k

Interpretation, equipment & connectivity £78k

Access improvements across site £25k

Volunteer accommodation £15k

Kilnsea wetlands

Land acquisition, habitat and access £140k

Hornsea South Promenade

Wildlife viewing and enhancement £9k

Flambro South Landing

Fit out and interpretation £13k

Flambro North Landing

Wildlife viewing and enhancement £50k

Business support and monitoring

Equipment, materials, events and monitoring £103k

Nature Tourism Project Staff £170k

Contingency £115k

Total £1,101,000.

Well now we know. When we have discussed the possibility of adding hides, scrapes,footpaths flower meadows, access for sea-anglers etc (all in the name of improving the visitor experience) we have been told there is no money or there is a 'funding gap'-its minuted check it out for yourselves.

I can see quite clearly how this will benefit YWT but Coastal Community? How will,practically speaking the Coastal Communities of Kilnsea and Easington benefit proportionally from the money being spent? £170 Grand on wages? You would think that projects such as the Visitor Centre would be self funding and sustainable (see quote above from CC website) would not have to be propped up by public money?

How many jobs outside of those being funded by the £170k wages pot do you think will be created in Easington and Kilnsea to justify the spend of nearly half a million quid?

Don't even get me started on the Lighthouse...

 

Factual information within this blog post is correct to the best of my knowledge. Opinions are my own and not of the Spurn Liaison group. Thank you for reading.